International Workshop
Open Issues in Industrial Use Case
Modeling
held in conjunction with
Seventh International Conference on the Unified
Modeling Language, UML 2004
October 10-15, 2004, Lisbon, Portugal
EXTENDED Submission deadline: August 16th
[Motivation] [Call for Papers] [Proceedings] [Organizers] [Bibliography]
Use Cases have received great
attention as a specification tool for observable behavior of systems. However, there are
still much controversy, inconsistent use, and free-flowing interpretations of
use case models. Not even the internationally recognized experts in the
community agree on the semantics of concepts. Consequently, in practice use
case models are dangerously ambiguous. The workshop purpose is to identify and
characterize ambiguity sources. It will gather specialists involved in modeling
use cases to exchange ideas and proposals, with an eye to both a clear
definition and practical application.
o
Issues
in this category include: use case relationships, use case standard templates,
use case contracts, and any information missing or extra in the two
representations.
Graphical and Textual
Use Cases
There are two main media for (UML)
use cases: textual specifications and diagrams. These “two worlds” have been
evolving in isolation to each other. The literature commonly emphasizes and
promotes written use case specifications for functional requirements capture,
which are organized according to a template; there is an implicit commitment to
what a use case template should include. In contrast, use case diagrams have
been used merely as an adequate graphical view on, or "entry point"
to, these written specifications. Practitioners and experts in the community
frequently warn against over-emphasizing use case diagrams and strenuously
advise never to neglect the use case textual specifications: in practice a use
case diagram serves as a support for text but not vice versa. Furthermore, the
techniques in the textual world are much more expressive and powerful compared
to the use case relationship capabilities in UML. Finally, UML does not provide
graphical modeling means for many aspects used in the textual world such as
linking use cases through pre- and post-condition relations. An important topic
of discussion for the proposed workshop includes textual vs. graphical use case
representations.
[PDF]
Workshop topics
Use Cases have achieved wide use as specification tool for observable behavior of systems. However, there are still much controversy, inconsistent use, and free-flowing interpretations of use case models including their inherent ambiguity. One of the purposes of this workshop is to identify and characterize some ambiguity sources. A goal of this workshop is to bring use case experts together to discuss use case modeling with an eye to reach some level of consensus on its practice, interpretation and other current problems. Some proposed topics include, but are not limited to:
The target audience
are researchers, lecturers and practitioners interested in use case
modeling. The workshop will produce identification and characterization of open
issues and promising avenues of inquiry.
Participants
We invite practitioners, lecturers
and researchers interested in use case modeling to submit position papers on
the proposed topics. The number of participants will be restricted to 15, by
invitation only, upon acceptance of a position paper according to reviewer’s
comments and overall fit with the workshop theme, so that a rich discussion can
follow the presentations. Additional papers may be explicitly invited if deemed
useful.
Submission
Position papers (4.000 words at
most) must be submitted in electronic form (PDF format encouraged), following the same style rules and format established for
the UML’04 Conference papers. Selection will be performed by an international
team of experts.
Dates
EXTENDED Submission deadline: August 16th
Notification of acceptance: September 3rd
Final version: September
18th
Workshop date:
Sunday, October 10th
Workshop activities
The workshop will have four sessions
of about 90 minutes each. The first two sessions will be devoted to
presentations (3-6 papers each, selected among position papers based on
relevance and to avoid redundancy); the third session will break into smaller
groups, according to the topics effectively considered by the papers; and the
fourth session will allow discussion to synthesize a final set of issues and
recommendations.
Papers will be made available at the
workshop Web site at least two weeks before the workshop takes place, and an
internet forum will be launched so that attendants may (should they choose)
cross-review and discuss contributions, even before physically meeting at the
Conference, and perhaps after it also; this forum and its contents will be
considered as archival material and kept by the Carlos III University of
Madrid.
Steering committee
§ ggenova[at]inf.uc3m.es
§ http://www.ie.inf.uc3m.es/ggenova/
§ llorens[at]inf.uc3m.es
§
pmetz[at]fbi.fh-darmstadt.de
§
http://www.fbi.fh-darmstadt.de/~p.metz
§ prietorx[at]cisat.jmu.edu
§ http://www.cs.jmu.edu/faculty/prietodiaz.htm
§ hernan[at]inf.utfsm.cl
§ http://www.inf.utfsm.cl/~hernan/
Program Committee
Updated: September 7th,
2005
Contact:
ggenova[at]inf.uc3m.es